somebody wrote:
>> I can see you did not bother answering how much you'd like to see
>> medical research get before you're willing to be OK with spending $10
>> billion for the LHC.
> 
> That's easy: $100,000 billion.
> 
> And that's a very low figure when you think about it. Even if it only saves
> 10 lives (gross, gross underestimate), I'm saying that the value of one
> human's life to me is about the same as satisfying the curiousity of about
> 1000 or so physicists. If you were faced with such a dilemma and were given
> a two buttons, which one would *you* push?

	So put another way, your answer is essentially "Never".

-- 
AAAAA - American Association Against Acronym Abuse


                     /\  /\               /\  /
                    /  \/  \ u e e n     /  \/  a w a z
                        >>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
                                    anl

Post a reply to this message